give module bounds a better respect for dynamic predicates
This commit is contained in:
@@ -101,8 +101,13 @@ impl SubModuleUser for IndexStore {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn remove_code_index(&mut self, key: PredicateKey) {
|
||||
fn remove_code_index(&mut self, key: PredicateKey)
|
||||
{
|
||||
self.code_dir.remove(&key);
|
||||
|
||||
if self.dynamic_code_dir.contains_key(&key) {
|
||||
self.dynamic_code_dir.remove(&key);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn insert_dir_entry(&mut self, name: ClauseName, arity: usize, idx: ModuleCodeIndex)
|
||||
@@ -208,6 +213,21 @@ impl Machine {
|
||||
self.machine_st.flags
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn check_dynamic_clause_overwrite(&self, name: ClauseName, arity: usize)
|
||||
-> Result<(), SessionError>
|
||||
{
|
||||
if let Some(info) = self.indices.dynamic_code_dir.get(&(name.clone(), arity)) {
|
||||
if info.module_src != name.owning_module() {
|
||||
let err_str = format!("{}/{}", name.as_str(), arity);
|
||||
let err_str = clause_name!(err_str, self.indices.atom_tbl());
|
||||
|
||||
return Err(SessionError::CannotOverwriteDynamicClause(err_str));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn check_toplevel_code(&self, indices: &IndexStore) -> Result<(), SessionError>
|
||||
{
|
||||
for (key, idx) in &indices.code_dir {
|
||||
@@ -222,6 +242,8 @@ impl Machine {
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
self.check_dynamic_clause_overwrite(key.0.clone(), key.1)?;
|
||||
|
||||
if let Some(ref existing_idx) = self.indices.code_dir.get(&key) {
|
||||
// ensure we don't try to overwrite an existing predicate from a different module.
|
||||
if !existing_idx.is_undefined() && !idx.is_undefined() {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user